It was stated in class about the unnecessary claims in the film, such as the Bush comment. I was glad to see that brought up so I don't have to focus on it. The other thing brought up was the issue of parents and how they should be held accountable. I was glad we were able to discuss that in class. I'm going to expand on that thought though. The argument can be made that your child will encounter media and advertising while you're not around. It is still the parent's responsibility to properly raise their child. I feel everything is the parent's responsibility in the up-bringing of their child. We are all products of how our parents raised us. And for those who had a lack of parent involvement, there is a difference in how they carry themselves now. The documentary told us that parents aren't doing a good job and we all need the government telling us what we need to be doing with our kids. Umm....no! Maybe parents who are irresponsible and don't love their kids need help from the government but I can do a better job at raising a great kid on my own. If I were a parent, I would be outraged at this group of people and government that feel I need help because I'm 'failing' as a parent. That feels like a slap in the face. How dare they?

The only problem with companies marketing towards kids is the lack of parental involvement in the child's life to help them discern between all the messages. Child abuse isn't coming from the company; the real child abuse is coming from the home. Shame on you lack-of-a-parent

